Upper Bounding the Price of Anarchy in Atomic Splittable Selfish Routing
نویسندگان
چکیده
Selfish behavior of nodes of a network such as sensors of a geographically distributed sensor network, each of which owned and operated by a different stakeholder may lead to a game theoretic setting called “selfish routing”. The fact that every node strictly aims at maximizing its own utility can cause degradations of social welfare. An issue of concern would be the quantitative measure of this inefficiency. We study the price of anarchy in selfish routing games, a quantitative measure of inefficiency of worst equilibrium of the game imposed by noncooperative behavior of players. For the most of this paper, we consider atomic models of selfish routing in which the network is a multicommodity flow network with multiple sources and sinks, and each player controls a considerable amount of the overall traffic. The price of anarchy for many variants of atomic splittable instances is not well understood, and upper bounding this parameter in presence of affine cost functions is the problems we tackle in this paper.
منابع مشابه
The Price of Collusion in Series-Parallel Networks
We study the quality of equilibrium in atomic splittable routing games. We show that in single-source single-sink games on seriesparallel graphs, the price of collusion — the ratio of the total delay of atomic Nash equilibrium to the Wardrop equilibrium — is at most 1. This proves that the existing bounds on the price of anarchy for Wardrop equilibria carry over to atomic splittable routing gam...
متن کاملSelfish routing and the price of anarchy
Selfish routing is a classical mathematical model of how self-interested users might route traffic through a congested network. The outcome of selfish routing is generally inefficient, in that it fails to optimize natural objective functions. The price of anarchy is a quantitative measure of this inefficiency. We survey recent work that analyzes the price of anarchy of selfish routing. We also ...
متن کاملThe Price of Routing Unsplittable Flow
The essence of the routing problem in real networks is that the traffic demand from a source to destination must be satisfied by choosing a single path between source and destination. The splittable version of this problem is when demand can be satisfied by many paths, namely a flow from source to destination. The unsplittable, or discrete version of the problem is more realistic yet is more co...
متن کاملRouting (Un-) Splittable Flow in Games with Player-Specific Linear Latency Functions
In this work we study weighted network congestion games with playerspecific latency functions where selfish players wish to route their traffic through a shared network. We consider both the case of splittable and unsplittable traffic. Our main findings are as follows: – For routing games on parallel links with linear latency functions without a constant term we introduce two new potential func...
متن کاملA Priority-Based Model of Routing
We consider a priority-based selfish routing model, where agents may have different priorities on a link. An agent with a higher priority on a link can traverse it with a smaller delay or cost than an agent with lower priority. This general framework can be used to model a number of different problems. The structural properties that lead to inefficiencies in routing choices appear different in ...
متن کامل